iansetr.blogg.se

Red herring fallacy in animal farm
Red herring fallacy in animal farm










red herring fallacy in animal farm

Nothing less would have enticed me back to editing other people’s writing. I’ve especially enjoyed its feisty engagements with literature – as if literature had weight, really mattered – such as Alexis Wright’s essay on Oodgeroo Noonuccal, ‘A Weapon of Poetry’, and its meaty 3-person review of Christos Tsiolkas’s Dead Europe.

red herring fallacy in animal farm

I love Overland’s political bent, its passion, argumentation, provocation, vision, big-picture writing about things that matter. But when Jeff Sparrow asked if I’d be interested in becoming Overland’s fiction editor, much to my surprise I said yes, immediately – because it was for Overland. The last book I edited was Christos Tsiolkas’s The Slap in 2007. I think of them as ‘politically engaged fiction’.īefore I started at Overland, I’d given up working as an editor. These are among my all-time favourite novels. Other examples that spring to mind are Animal Farm, Catch-22, Vonnegut Jr’s Slaughterhouse-5 and Player Piano, Orhan Pamuk’s Snow, Christos Tsiolkas’s Dead Europe.

red herring fallacy in animal farm

I gave a few examples of the sort of fiction I did mean, including Alexis Wright’s Carpentaria, Zamyatin’s We, The Master and Margarita, 100 Years of Solitude, Brave New World, 1984. So I thought it would be a good moment to reflect on this year of fiction, especially in light of the debates last year about the possibility of ‘ politically engaged fiction’, which I said was the sort of fiction I was hoping to publish in Overland.Īt the time I made it clear that by this phrase I didn’t mean social realism. A new issue of Overland (205) is out this week and marks the end of my first year as its fiction editor.












Red herring fallacy in animal farm